Jeremy Grantham: US should focus on “green” infrastructure spending

Jeremy Grantham, co-founder of asset manager GMO, says the US must set out on a new “green” Marshall Plan to tackle climate change.

Solar panels and wind turbines
(Image credit: © Getty Images/iStockphoto)

If the US is serious about tackling the biggest challenges facing the country right now, it needs to embark on a new “green” Marshall Plan, says Jeremy Grantham.

Jeremy Grantham, who co-founded US asset manager GMO in 1977, believes the US government should take advantage of historically low interest rates to finance “a long, sustained and massive public works programme”, similar to the scheme that helped to rebuild Europe in the wake of World War II, “at negative real rates”.

While Covid-19 is today’s obvious concern, Grantham is more worried about long-term issues. “I believe income inequality is eating away at the economy from the inside with the lack of economic progress for workers reducing demand.”

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

This problem goes back to the financial crisis, if not beyond. “The great waste in 2009 and 2010... was the use of precious resources to bail out banks,” says Grantham. The decision “was both unjust and economically inefficient: it was a violation of the spirit of capitalism”.

A new Marshall Plan should focus on “green” infrastructure spending: “It is absolutely imperative that the entire economy be greened if we want any hope to maintain a stable global civilisation in coming centuries.” Infrastructure in the US is already “unusually behind schedule on maintenance and subpar quality”, and many of the jobs created would be “industrial and labour-intensive”, helping to address growing inequality. The move would also help challenge China’s “growing dominance” in green tech.